Theology of Enough

May 31, 2010 · 12 comments

We have confused, as a society, wants and needs, and a lot of people have raised up their wants way above their needs and way above their abilities to support all those wants”  Millard Fuller       

The title of my post is an ode to a chapter in one of his books.  Fuller refered to it as the Theology of Enough. Its the  idea that there is a point where consumers possess everything they need  and buying more makes their lives worse rather than better. Like simple living,“enough-ism” emphasizes less spending and more restraint in the buying behaviour. Enoughism is an antonym to consumerism      

 What do you really need in your home or in your life? Its really a question that I want you all to answer.  What do you really NEED?I have been ruminating on this for the past few weeks, and because I have been struggling to answer this question for myself, I have not been able to actually write this blog post.  For the past two weeks I have been reading and meditating on the “Theology of Enough”.  We humans (especially those of of us from more developed countries have a hard time differentiating a need from a want.  We believe the commercials, the ads, the hype and honestly the bullshit.      

We consume  and consume and consume more stuff everyday. I want to say that the real issue is not consumption itself but its patterns and effects. Yet, I think that would be a lie. The real issue is consumption and what does it take for us as humans to feel full…satiated…satisfied….whole.    

   

That’s why I think of this post as the Theology of Enough..its about  filling up something deep within ourselves..some place in our soul that we think one more flat screen TV or 1,000 additional square feet will help fill.      

Who exactly ARE the Joneses and why have we decided to let them be the stick by which we measure ourselves.  Why are we letting them define us and mold us into bigger, better consumers  rather than  more compassionate, loving  people?     

Today’s consumption is undermining the environment. You all are smart folks, you know this.  That oil spill in the Gulf is happening because we as as society continue to want to  feel satiated by STUFF, PHOO-PHA  and THINGS.  It is exacerbating inequalities. And the dynamics of the consumption-poverty-inequality-environment nexus are out of control. Runaway growth in consumption is killing the earth, and killing us….Spiritually, physically and emotionally.      

Inequalities in consumption are stark. Globally, the 20% of the world’s people in the highest-income countries account for 86% of total private consumption expenditures — the poorest 20% a minuscule 1.3%. More specifically, the richest fifth:       

  • Consume 45% of all meat and fish, the poorest fifth 5%
  • Consume 58% of total energy, the poorest fifth less than 4%
  • Have 74% of all telephone lines, the poorest fifth 1.5%
  • Consume 84% of all paper, the poorest fifth 1.1%
  • Own 87% of the world’s vehicle fleet, the poorest fifth less than 1%

These numbers go beyond meeting basic needs.  They actually make me nauseous. The facts I just quoted come from an old UNDP report…so if anyone can point me to more  recent figures please do.     

If the trends continue without change — not redistributing from high-income to low-income consumers, not shifting from polluting to cleaner goods and production technologies, not promoting goods that empower poor producers, not shifting priority from consumption for conspicuous display to meeting basic needs — today’s problems of consumption and human development will worsen.     

We can tell our values by looking at our checkbook stubs. ~Gloria Steinem  Oh man do I dig Gloria. Seriously. Consider the following which shows  the world priorities ( i.e. OUR priorities):     

  • We spend $8 Billion a year in the US on cosmetics.
  • We spend $12 Billion a year in the US and Europe on perfume.
  • We spend $50 Billion a year in the US and Europe on cigarettes

And compare that to what was estimated as additional costs to achieve universal access to basic social services in all developing countries:     

  • Basic Education for all $6 Billion
  • Water and Sanitation for all  $9 Billion
  • Reproductive health  for all women  $12 Billion

(Source: The state of human development, United Nations Human Development Report 1998, Chapter 1, p.37)       

The Theology of Enough is about being filled up from the inside out. Its being satisfied with the  old television because you know its enough. It does its job  without problem or worry. It meets my needs.  Its Enough.    

 Others may expect that some one of your status, education level, or  income should own a new car, a large house  and  flat screen televisions. Its about understanding that the somewhere across the water a 15 year old girl has worked as a virtual slave in a blue jean factory in China  making less than 2$ a day so that I can buy ANOTHER pair of 10$ jeans from a big box store to fill my already overflowing closet .  Will I be judged by friends, family, colleagues and neighbors  for choosing to own  only one  pair of jeans or live in a smaller house or not have all of the  stuff that a person my age is supposed to have ? Probably, but I am OK with that because in my mind enough really is enough.  

 

Free updates via RSS or Email delivered straight to your RSS reader or inbox.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Tweets that mention Theology of Enough — Desiree Adaway -- Topsy.com
May 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM
Simple Living News Update
June 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Iyabo Asani May 31, 2010 at 8:10 PM

Desiree! Well said. However, I want to bring an additional perspective.

I love shoes. I have lots of them in every color I like. Flats, slides, mules – all of them. I have whittled them down to just the ones I love and feel comfortable in.

Growing up in a very middle class family in Nigeria, my dad was the most conservative, non-consumer I ever met. He consumed books and information but things like clothes and shoes he did not understand. So I had school sandals and trainers (sneakers) – just two pairs of shoes. I did not have dress shoes. Not because we could not afford it but he, who probably grew up barefoot, felt that even though he was the 13th Nigerian to ever receive a Ph.d, which he got from Columbia University in New York, that three pairs of shoes for his daughter was over the top.

So I grew up and came to America and I bought shoes galore. I will never stop buying shoes. I love foot ware. But I no longer buy in response to the deprivation I felt. I do buy in response to purely what I like and I find myself buying less and less. It just does not appeal to me as much.

I make this point to say that it is OK to spend but spend deliberately. Also when you are deliberate about what you spend and on what you spend it, you feel more in control. Giving has to be part of your spending. Giving to causes you support. Giving to those you love. Giving to yourself in the form of savings.

I believe that the problem lies in how we define wealth.

You see this in Africa, where they want to be like Americans. Wealth to them means spending lavishly, driving a Mercedes Benz, and having different cell phones to match the outfit that you wear. Having lavish parties and importing flowers and champagne from overseas is a sure sign of your wealth.

The Western image of wealth is not Bill Gates putting money behind the causes that he supports or Warren Buffet still living in the house that he bought in the fifties.

The Western image of wealth is Beverly Hills and Gucci and Prada and Chanel and rappers.

Thank you for your perspective and reminding us of what really matters.

Reply

2 Desiree Adaway May 31, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Iyabo,
Great perspective and points that add to the complexity of the question. When are we satiated? Is it a 1000 square foot home…2000…3000? Do 2 people neeed to live in a home that has 4 bathrooms. Are we ordering the flowers and champagne for our selves or for others? When does luxury just become greedy? I do know a lot of our need to consume comes from our enviornment and whats socially acceptable and ultimately what is valued by society. I have lots and lots and lots of books….someone could look at me and say why do you own so many and honestly much like you with shoes… they give me pleasure. While they may judge my lack of shoes. :) I think much like you as our lives evolve with age and experience so does what we consume and why.

Thanks for stopping by and joining the discussion.

Reply

3 Julie Daley June 1, 2010 at 5:50 PM

Sobering. Especially the figures on cosmetics, perfume and cigarettes in relation to Education, Sanitation and reproductive health in developing countries. Very sobering.
I think you hit it on the head with this being about trying to fill a hole that can’t be filled with STUFF.

Reply

4 Desiree Adaway June 2, 2010 at 7:56 PM

Julie,

We can not make ourselves happy by purchasing another gadget…soul poor and “THINGS rich” is a sad state to be in and I say no thank you.

Reply

5 Bungi June 2, 2010 at 11:21 AM

It is said that economic development gives increased choices. I wonder why people don’t use the freedom of choice for downward mobility instead of upward mobility.

I think, by trying to consciously choose downward mobility we should do better.

Reply

6 Desiree Adaway June 2, 2010 at 7:59 PM

I absolutely agree…downward mobility by choice lets start a revolution!

Reply

7 Deb Owen June 2, 2010 at 12:41 PM

It’s funny that the comments brought about the question of ‘what is enough’

As I read it, I was thinking of people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett (of course, they aren’t exactly ‘hurting’ either ;-) )

Or…my grandfather used to meet with Sam Walton (he was the head of sales for Hunter fans, my grandfather) and would comment on how ‘you wouldn’t know he had any money’. Everyone’s heard about how he drove the same old truck forever, right?

Or Rick Warren and how, with the success of Purpose-Driven life, still lives in the same house and drives a 12 year old truck and gave most of the money away.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with working hard and enjoying the fruits of your labor. At the same time, the statistics you posted about how much we spend on cosmetics vs. what we would need to spend on education, for example…..are a bit startling.

And I love the title ‘the theology of enough’ – when is it enough? Great post, as always, Desiree.

Love you!
d

Reply

8 Anna June 15, 2010 at 9:21 AM

Thank you for this post. I am struggling with this whole thing myself. I no longer feel the need to have the house we are living in, and God has provided another house, that is 1800 sq ft less than this one. We must remodel it a bit, because of mold and water damage, before we move in, but even that is hard to figure out how much is enough. Do we buy and install a new bath tub, even though this one would work alright, although it is a bit old and icky? When do we stop with the remodels? All the doorhandles in the place don’t match… is that a problem for me? I’m not sure. I don’t think so. Matching door handles won’t make me happy. But would a new bathtub? Or is providing a new tub for my kids to bathe them in, being loving to them? Sometimes I think we justify our actual needs. Luckily, I now know that buying one more thing doesn’t fill the hole, belief in Jesus Christ does, He saved me from all this. Now, just to separate needs from wants….

Reply

9 Desiree Adaway June 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM

Hi Anna,
I think only you can draw the line and find the balance needed for you and your family. I think for me on eof the important milestones was when I decided to become more AWARE of how my needs affected others. When I decided to stop and ask myself a few questions that made me meditate on wants and needs then it all became a little easier.

I appreciate your reading my post and I hope you found it useful as you move along your path!

Blessings,

Desiree

Reply

10 Bungi June 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM

Came across this in my inbox today from the Henri Nouwen Society:

Downward Mobility

The society in which we live suggests in countless ways that the way to go is up. Making it to the top, entering the limelight, breaking the record – that’s what draws attention, gets us on the front page of the newspaper, and offers us the rewards of money and fame.

The way of Jesus is radically different. It is the way not of upward mobility but of downward mobility. It is going to the bottom, staying behind the sets, and choosing the last place! Why is the way of Jesus worth choosing? Because it is the way to the Kingdom, the way Jesus took, and the way that brings everlasting life.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: